What was demonstrated
The Unity lane completed build/promotion, smoke consume on promoted input, package preview, and promoted consumption, while refusing unpromoted input under the same governed flow.
Why it matters
This gives the public proof surface a second engine lane with the same discipline profile, strengthening the claim that governed execution is a repeatable system pattern instead of a one-off success.
Governance / verification posture
- Promoted inputs proceed through build, smoke, packaging, and consumption checks.
- Unpromoted inputs are expected to refuse rather than bypass policy.
- Hash manifests and stage IDs provide internal verification backing.
Public-safe artifact
Stage outcome summary
- Build / promote: pass
- Smoke consume promoted: pass
- Package preview: pass
- Consume promoted: pass
- Refuse unpromoted: enforced
Cross-engine signal
- Governed execution carries across engine environments.
- Promotion and refusal logic are consistent.
- Consumption checks remain part of the proof story.
What is intentionally omitted
- Internal project paths, raw smoke reports, and private run roots.
- Unity-specific internal implementation details not needed for public diligence.
- Raw logs and hash files that remain internal evidence.
Related proof / milestone links